Read distance performance and variation of 5 low-frequency radio frequency identification panel transceiver manufacturers.

Use of electronic animal identification technologies by livestock managers is increasing, but performance of these technologies can be variable when used in livestock production environments. This study was conducted to determine whether 1) read distance of low-frequency radio frequency identification (RFID) transceivers is affected by type of transponder being interrogated; 2) read distance variation of low-frequency RFID transceivers is affected by transceiver manufacturer; and 3) read distance of various transponder-transceiver manufacturer combinations meet the 2004 United States Animal Identification Plan (USAIP) bovine standards subcommittee minimum read distance recommendation of 60 cm. Twenty-four transceivers (n = 5 transceivers per manufacturer for Allflex, Boontech, Farnam, and Osborne; n = 4 transceivers for Destron Fearing) were tested with 60 transponders [n = 10 transponders per type for Allflex full duplex B (FDX-B), Allflex half duplex (HDX), Destron Fearing FDX-B, Farnam FDX-B, and Y-Tex FDX-B; n = 6 for Temple FDX-B (EM Microelectronic chip); and n = 4 for Temple FDX-B (HiTag chip)] presented in the parallel orientation. All transceivers and transponders met International Organization for Standardization 11784 and 11785 standards. Transponders represented both one-half duplex and full duplex low-frequency air interface technologies. Use of a mechanical trolley device enabled the transponders to be presented to the center of each transceiver at a constant rate, thereby reducing human error. Transponder and transceiver manufacturer interacted (P < 0.0001) to affect read distance, indicating that transceiver performance was greatly dependent upon the transponder type being interrogated. Twenty-eight of 30 combinations of transceivers and transponders evaluated met the minimum recommended USAIP read distance. The mean read distance across all 30 combinations was 45.1 to 129.4 cm. Transceiver manufacturer and transponder type interacted to affect read distance variance (P < 0.05). Maximum read distance performance of low-frequency RFID technologies with low variance can be achieved by selecting specific transponder-transceiver combinations.